Supreme Court ruling on Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila
hmoruling.pdf | 330.6 kB
June 21, 2004
Respondents brought separate Texas state-court suits, alleging that petitioners, their health maintenance organizations (HMOs), had re-fused to cover certain medical services in violation of an HMO’s duty “to exercise ordinary care” under the Texas Health Care Liability Act (THCLA), and that those refusals “proximately caused” respondents’ injuries.
US Supreme Court