Mortgage Meltdown Update


We support reforms to the financial marketplace that protect consumers from unscrupulous banks and lenders.

By Consumers Union on Tuesday, October 14th, 2008

Record numbers of homeowners are losing their homes to foreclosures and the foreclosure filings continue. In August, one in every 416 households in the U.S. received a foreclosure notice. Some states like California, Nevada and Arizona have been particularly hard hit. Though California experienced a significant dip in the number of foreclosure filings in September, due to new legislation that went into effect to build more safeguards into the foreclosure process, the Governor vetoed a bill that would have put in some longer term protections against the type of lending abuses that are at the root of the foreclosure crisis. I’m wondering, isn’t leadership about protecting the public against a known danger, instead of asking taxpayers to rescue the mortgage meltdown culprits after the damage is done?

This one comes under the category of “Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse.” The news headlines have been filled with stories about the serious foreclosure crisis in the United States. Homeowners throughout the country, in rural, suburban and urban areas are losing their homes in record numbers. According to, a company which monitors national foreclosure filings, one in every 416 households in the U.S. received a foreclosure notice in the month of August 2008.

If that weren’t bad enough, the numbers in California, Nevada, or Arizona are even more staggering. In Nevada, one in every 91 households received a foreclosure filing in August, representing an 89 percent increase from August 2007. In California, it was one in every 130 households. Arizona came in third with one in every 182 households receiving a foreclosure filing in August.

But in California, something amazing is happening. In the month of September 2008, the number of California Notice of Default filings, which indicate the start of the foreclosure process, declined by 61.8 percent, according to, another foreclosure tracking company. This source attributes this decline to the implementation of SB 1137, emergency legislation sponsored by Consumers Union and other consumer groups in California, which became effective September 8, 2008. Authored by Senator Don Perata, this new law requires lenders to attempt to contact borrowers prior to filing a Notice of Default, or completing a foreclosure if the delinquency is at a later stage. To reduce unnecessary foreclosures, this new law encourages increased communication between borrowers and lenders and loan modifications as an alternative to foreclosures. While modifications are encouraged, there is no requirement that one take place. Not surprisingly, ForeclosureRadar commented, “We expect SB 1137 to have no long term impact beyond delaying the foreclosure process for homeowners, and slowing the overall recovery.”

While we don’t think that preventing unnecessary foreclosures is bad for the economy, we couldn’t agree more that SB 1137 is not a long term solution. SB 1137 deals with the “here and now” of the foreclosure crisis. That is why consumer advocates also supported AB 1830, authored by Assemblymember Ted Lieu. AB 1830 was intended to address some of the worst lending practices at the root of the hundreds of thousands of failed mortgages in California. AB 1830 was the promising legislation that proposed some workable solutions to preventing a future mortgage meltdown.

But an awful thing happened to AB 1830 after the California Legislature put the bill on the Governor’s desk. On September 25, 2008, Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed this critically important bill. Let’s remember that California is home to 1,300 foreclosures every business day, which are pushing housing prices down, eroding wealth from millions of homeowners and draining the state and local governments of critical revenue. In this environment, rather than standing up for the people of California, Governor Schwarzenegger stood with the mortgage brokers and bankers and missed the opportunity to put the brakes on some serious mortgage lending abuses. AB 1830 would have required brokers to put borrowers first by limiting some of the perverse incentives that encourage brokers to steer borrowers into inappropriate loans which are more likely to fail. We applauded Governor Schwarzenegger for signing SB 1137 and dealing with the immediate foreclosure crisis, but it’s a tragedy that he didn’t use his leadership to rein in abusive lending practices that will feed future mortgage meltdowns.

After a story like this, one has to wonder, who is looking out for the little guy? In this era of quick action bailing out failing financial institutions and using taxpayer dollars to fix something that’s broken– instead of fixing the reasons for the failure– there are very few bright stars in this very dark horizon. That’s why the CNN Story about Thomas J. Dart, the Sheriff from Cook County, Illinois is so energizing. Sheriff Dart rode into town just when I thought there were no true heroes left. Sheriff Dart said he will no longer do the lenders’ dirty work and declared a moratorium on foreclosure evictions in Cook County. In a matter of fact manner, the Sheriff said he is ready to take on the banks and lenders and blames the foreclosures on their irresponsible lending practices.

Too bad Sheriff Dart doesn’t have more influence in California and elsewhere. We could use someone like him looking out for us.

Norma P. Garcia
Consumers Union

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *